Abraham Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Essay

Aron Ralstons physiological request was to satisfy his hunger, thirst, and a need to discern and be loved. His desire was to be a father. This gave him a purpose to live. His will to live became greater than dying. tho thirst and hunger overcame him to a organise where he was saving and sipping his accept urine to stay alive. I likewise believe that he had a divine appointment as he was sh confess insight into his reproductive future by the vision he had of a son. He was also shown that he was going to doze off his arm when he saw the preschool boy being scooped up by a unmatchable gird gentlemans gentleman.I do not know if Aron believed in God or if he eventide had a relationship with my Lord and Savior or not, but I do think that his spiritual phylogenesis should have grown through his journey. Hunger faecal matter put us in a biography or death situation. After hours of driving alone in an unfamiliar city, you finally see a diner where you can eat. Even though it lo oks deserted and a little creepy, you end up tenia because you ar really hungry. correspond to Maslow (pg 407) our need to meet the physiological need of hunger and thirst takes precedence over our safety of necessity prompting us to take risk at times in parade to eat.See more thanMasters of Satire John Dryden and Jonathan Swift EssayReferencesMyers, David G. Psychology. New York Worth, 1998. Print.Abraham Maslows Hierarchy of Needs EssayWith the exception of reflexes, the science of psychology portends that all humans carriage is motivated. The character is exhaustively dealt with by different schools of thought and each of which appears to be valid business relationships of human behavior. Dr. Abraham Maslow (Halonen & Santrock, 1996) made a strenuous effort to arrange human motives in a hierarchy from stronger and lower at one end to weaker and higher(prenominal) at the other(a). Maslow essentially suggested that what man really wants is more of everything. Man desi res a emend and better situation for himself.He wants only what he does not already have, and thus satisfied needfully do not motivate behavior. Maslow said that needs or wants can be arranged in a hierarchy of importance. Thus, when needs on the lower level are fulfilled, those on a higher level emerge and demand satiscircum perspectiveion. The hierarchy of needs he suggested rigid physiological needs as lowest or basic, then safety needs, social needs, esteem needs, and finally self-realization needs. In other words, Maslow believed that higher needs are expressed only when the prepotent physiological needs are satisfied.See morePerseverance essayThis is also true of needs for safety and security. Until there is a basic come in of order and stability in meeting the lower needs, a soul may have little interest in higher pursuits (Halonen & Santrock, 1996). A person with an empty stomach cannot be expected to carry through literary work or tasked to write an essay about the e ffects of war on Afghanistan. The story attempts to scrutinize the validity of Maslows Hierarchy of Needs scheme based on several criteria which shall be discussed as follows. DiscussionMaslows scheme is classified under the humanistic perspective as it emphasizes the advocate towards an idiosyncratic must proceed which is self-actualization. This point in his hierarchy, Maslow tried to explain in much detail. According to him, self-actualization when attained, demonstrates what it is to be a fully substantial human being. It is described as elusive due to the fact that man must have to satisfy the lower needs or those needs preceding this highest need (Halonen & Santrock, 1996). To satisfy further ones curiosity about this theory, the theory will be inflexible by the followingFreedom or Determinism can a person control their own behavior or is it determined by internal or international forces? In Maslows viewpoint, human motives are ordered in hierarchy and thus, man respon ds to these as they arise (Halonen & Santrock, 1996). With this premise, the theory is basically leaning toward the philosophic psyche of freedom. Man is free to chart his course and how he is supposed to fulfill his sundry(a) needs i. e. his physiological dimension. In addition, the manner with which he carves himself in a particular niche that satisfies his psychological domains is also based on his own volition.There is no flavor of unconscious thoughts pervading motivation like when the idea of psychological instincts being interpreted within Maslows understanding in contrast to this notion, any individual can basically control their own behavior. Maslows theory believes on the capacities of human nature to carry through what man wants to achieve rather than be held captive by forces within him or in his external world it is the internal determinants such as self-determination that separates the theory from the rest especially among those with the deterministic stance (Halon en & Santrock, 1996).Hereditary or Environmental are the characteristics a person has inherited and inborn or is it developed by social influences? Since the premise of this theory hinges on freedom, a persons characteristics therefore are developed by social influences. According to Maslow then, hoi polloi vary in their manner of satisfying their needs because of various environmental influences that surround him/her. Man is free to choose from several options adequately bring home the bacon for his own needs or desires. What are essentials though, are mans tendencies or propensity to follow the order of needs.Biology or heritability is deemphasized, rather the value of experience is pre-eminent in the theory (Halonen & Santrock, 1996). Uniqueness or universality individuals are unique or people are all pretty much the same This theory eventually emphasizes individuality or uniqueness, as it fundamentally illustrates in its assertion that every one has the potentiality for brea kthroughs in circumstances which may be difficult. Man is also capable to understand himself and others, showing a lot of hope on the potentials that man possesses that he can exhaust in his animationtime (Halonen & Santrock, 1996).proactive or Reactive individuals act on their own initiative or just in reception to external stimuli? Since man is free, unique and has the possibilities to accomplish whatever he is set to do, it is also asserted that man is proactive he can choose how to respond in any situation and may even extend himself to advance his interests, both positive and negative at whatever goal or in whatever circumstance he may be in (Halonen & Santrock, 1996). Optimistic or Pessimistic individuals can change given the right environment or they are unchangeable?The Hierarchy theory by design is hopeful and positive in every essence, if one is to follow the line of thinking which Maslow attempt to direct his audience. Individuals then have all the chances to make thei r lives fulfilling, impact others on virtues of honesty, charity and generosity, if and when he determines himself to be one. Likewise, he can also influence and negatively affect those that surround him when he chooses to do so. In this perspective then, an individual has high hopes of changing his attitudes and disposition, as well as his physical arrangements in life (Halonen & Santrock, 1996).Part II. Evaluation of the theory If this theory is to be evaluated, the strength of Maslows assumptions lies in his recognition of the positives that earthly concern possess. It reminds the audience of the person as a whole being and not just an organism playing area to either what the psychoanalysts termed as instincts or behaviorists position as merely organismic. The emphasis on developing the potentialities stigma Maslows crowning achievement in terms of theoretical appeal (Halonen & Santrock, 1996). However, there are translucent or clear discrepancies or weaknesses in the theory. Since Psychology claims to start and end as a scientific endeavor, thus following scientific procedures to provide proofs to any of its claims, then Maslows theory must be ready to be tested accordingly. And this is where his theory fails in almost every measure in essence. At the outset, this viewpoint of explaining behavior is difficult to measure or put to test. Specifically, despite the details and emphasis Maslow placed on self-actualization the concept is still hard to operationally define. Scientists then and now are encountering various dilemmas in making the concept scientifically or empirically acceptable.In addition, there are illogical and discordant presuppositions in the constructs he postulated. He adheres to mans capability to choose and yet how can he justify the existence of the structure of ordering needs in every individual if man is not born with it in the first place. How can he explain as well on those people who have achieved (jumped to the higher order need s) when they are barely existing or are starving at the same time being altruistic and yet has no means to adequately meet their own needs (Halonen & Santrock, 1996).Lastly, studies even show that galore(postnominal) who adhere to this philosophical viewpoint shun the scientific procedures obligate on any scientific field or discipline, and choose to lean towards the clinical orientation for the explanation of specific behaviors or motivations. Others who examined this theory explained that the assumptions on human behavior are too high or exaggerating on positives or the freedom and the logical capabilities that humans possess.Maslows theory, especially his self-actualization concept, critics affirm, implies the tendency for man to reinforce his self-centeredness (Halonen & Santrock, 1996). Conclusion If popularity and appeal are benchmarks for a theory to pass with flying colors, Maslows theory probably will go to the top. This is evidenced also as to the current prevalence of h is theory in business it is pervadingly present in almost every discussion in any business commission course apparently (Halonen & Santrock, 1996).For convenience, I too would readily fall for his theory and its seemingly simplistic counseling of explaining behaviors. But if I were to stick to following empirical underpinnings, I should say that the theory is not fat enough to satisfy more difficult human dilemmas, though in some instances, the theory seems to point to some aspects of lifes realities. It is not fitted to compel me to believe in the theory enough. To illustrate, prosecute many of our own self-centered needs only frustrates us all the time and eventually makes many of us disordered and mentally sick along the way.Can I use it to predict human nature? In fairness, yes but to a certain extent only, because as I mentioned, it is not sufficient enough to merit full dependence. The theory can probably modified to some degree as a picture of several aspects of being hum an, but to explain about the potentialities, may imply believe too much when all that is in there is just hot air, so to speak. Self-actualization may provide hope for those who are so discouraged in life, but it is still very limited in reality.Some even say that a by-product of this belief is a sense of irresponsibility (Halonen & Santrock, 1996). Remarkably, Maslow suggested that various famous personalities illustrate what his theory posited including Beethoven, the brilliant composer, and Lincoln, one of the greatest leaders of all time. Each of them exemplified individuals who had characteristics of the self-actualized person (Halonen & Santrock, 1996). Reference Halonen, Jane and John Santrock (1996). Psychology Contexts of Behavior. Brown and Benchmark Publishers, pp. 453 and 553-556.